Again, I’ve no personal experience of an open marriage (though I’ve occasionally wondered in the past whether it would have been a good idea, given my own history…) only by knowing of, and witnessing, friends’ experience.I think at @fincon summed it up.
Surely swinging is something you do together as a couple and an open marriage is either of you having sex with whoever either of you want.
X
If we kept saying things like this to every discussion, there'd be nothing to discuss - ever. xUltimately once they are happy that's all that matters l
If we kept saying things like this to every discussion, there'd be nothing to discuss - ever. x
Because if it was, then there'd never be any reason to ever discuss anything ever on here, ever again - would there.Ultimately once they are happy that's all that matters l
But of course I love a good debate
Sx
What is the difference?
From my experience of both (I’ve two couples who are friends with open marriages…) the biggest difference is that while each knows the other is having sex with other people, that’s as far as it goes; it doesn’t form part of their own sex lives, in respect of details.
N & A are in an open marriage. N knows A has sex with various others, and might even know when, but not necessarily who with, or what they do, precisely.
It’s in addition to, but very much not part of, any sex life they have between them.
Anyway, in relation to the OP, I'd go with this. An open marriage is not the same as swinging. Swinging is something a married couple do together for fun, together, for extra sexual fun between them.I think at @fincon summed it up.
Surely swinging is something you do together as a couple and an open marriage is either of you having sex with whoever either of you want.
X
Btw all this is in my personal opinion and my personal point of view only.Anyway, in relation to the OP, I'd go with this. An open marriage is not the same as swinging. Swinging is something a married couple do together for fun, together, for extra sexual fun between them.
An open marriage is the opposite of that where either one of the couple have sex with strangers outside of their marriage for their own personal sexual gratification - maybe because they're missing something from within the marriage or perhaps they just like sexual freedoms. There's a plethora of reasons I should imagine, but the two are vastly different.
It's like meeting alone when in a marriage or partnership, in swinging - not something I would do and I personally don't class that as swinging either.
Don't think so rigidly; there's more overlap and commonality between the two than there are difference.
We straddle both camps.
We began as swingers but soon came across the fundamental problem of finding couples who are on the same page, attractive to both of us, and devoid of 'issues'. We've found a few, but only a few.
Then there's the problem of singles; we have several unicorns we play with both jointly and severally, which is great, but we're not both bisexual so it can get a bit asymmetric and, as we both like to play, could get uneven.
Then there's the issue of babysitting. Sounds trivial but if you don't have family around I assure you it isn't. The number of dates we've had to skip or cut short due to flakey sitters doesn't bear thinking about!
Solution; play separately, which we now do about as often as together, and probably makes our marriage 'open.
We both have our own paramours (and some we share) and it saves all the grief. We don't do the hotwife or cuckold 'things', which are just a bit lame, and we don't 'dadt' which is frankly silly.
Neither of us feels we're missing out at home; we just like variety, and dislike rules....
...and labels.
We’re both aware of how you choose to live this lifestyle, through meeting you and chatting.. but I have to say that this is a very interesting post Captain. Thank you for sharing.Don't think so rigidly; there's more overlap and commonality between the two than there are difference.
We straddle both camps.
We began as swingers but soon came across the fundamental problem of finding couples who are on the same page, attractive to both of us, and devoid of 'issues'. We've found a few, but only a few.
Then there's the problem of singles; we have several unicorns we play with both jointly and severally, which is great, but we're not both bisexual so it can get a bit asymmetric and, as we both like to play, could get uneven.
Then there's the issue of babysitting. Sounds trivial but if you don't have family around I assure you it isn't. The number of dates we've had to skip or cut short due to flakey sitters doesn't bear thinking about!
Solution; play separately, which we now do about as often as together, and probably makes our marriage 'open.
We both have our own paramours (and some we share) and it saves all the grief. We don't do the hotwife or cuckold 'things', which are just a bit lame, and we don't 'dadt' which is frankly silly.
Neither of us feels we're missing out at home; we just like variety, and dislike rules....
...and labels.
I take my hat off to you both, something I couldn't even think about, I am trying to picture @Lips_Pearls reaction if I waved him off on the door to go have a meet with someone, whilst he stayed at home with the children or vice versaDon't think so rigidly; there's more overlap and commonality between the two than there are difference.
We straddle both camps.
We began as swingers but soon came across the fundamental problem of finding couples who are on the same page, attractive to both of us, and devoid of 'issues'. We've found a few, but only a few.
Then there's the problem of singles; we have several unicorns we play with both jointly and severally, which is great, but we're not both bisexual so it can get a bit asymmetric and, as we both like to play, could get uneven.
Then there's the issue of babysitting. Sounds trivial but if you don't have family around I assure you it isn't. The number of dates we've had to skip or cut short due to flakey sitters doesn't bear thinking about!
Solution; play separately, which we now do about as often as together, and probably makes our marriage 'open.
We both have our own paramours (and some we share) and it saves all the grief. We don't do the hotwife or cuckold 'things', which are just a bit lame, and we don't 'dadt' which is frankly silly.
Neither of us feels we're missing out at home; we just like variety, and dislike rules....
...and labels.
Very strong and loyal,@Captain-Smith-and-Lady-Jane, must admit I can understand why some couples branch out, sadly one scenario that's far too common is the one where she's wanted but he isn't. I think many a woman misses out because she's loyal. That said loyalty is more important. Is great to have a relationship so strong spending time away with another or others is zero threat to that bond.