Just out of intrigue, in what way was she a fake? Was she pretending to be man or a couple or something else?
B x
Someone who has been with us but not photo verified for three years has turned out to be fake, even had a meet verification. Both accounts are now banned. So PV is the way forward folks
It wasn't a he
Her photos were fake, when asked to Pv, she declined, a couple of other detections but I can't mention them here.Just out of intrigue, in what way was she a fake? Was she pretending to be man or a couple or something else?
B x
So either a man pretending to be a woman or one of these people who set up fake accounts with fake pics hoping to swap numbers where it costs £5 a minute to ringHer photos were fake, when asked to Pv, she declined, a couple of other detections but I can't mention them here.
You got itSo either a man pretending to be a woman or one of these people who set up fake accounts with fake pics hoping to swap numbers where it costs £5 a minute to ring........
......... or just a munter who used pics of a more better looking person.
B x
Unless I have missed the message...shouldn't you say who the banned member is ? They are banned so not o reason to name them as they / he / she were using a fair name , email., Details etc.Someone who has been with us but not photo verified for three years has turned out to be fake, even had a meet verification. Both accounts are now banned. So PV is the way forward folks
I know what you're saying, but it's not, really, very ethical to name and shame. There could be, for example, a user on another site with the same name, but unrelated. The actual owner of the pics could be on a site somewhere. I'm reasonably sure that it would break data protection laws, too.Unless I have missed the message...shouldn't you say who the banned member is ? They are banned so not o reason to name them as they / he / she were using a fair name , email., Details etc.
So who was it ? Some members may have exchanged mobile numbers abd email addresses with this man / woman / couple ...only right to say who it is .
Yes the pictures are fake but you're not judging the pics... Just the anonymous person that stole the pictures. But we should be told about the fake social swinging going account .
No, they didn't. They would have only had that level of access through photo verification, which they refused to do. This is what the PV system is for; to protect the members.this person/s has had access to private photos
If someone does not realise after 3 years that someone is "fake". Well I wouldn't rely on that person's judgementAdmins will be able to see who wxchanged what privately with this person and will im sure have told people about this.
I dont think its right to ask for details publicly or to start a witch hunt.
Pretty sure if someone has been chatting to someone for 3yrs and they disappear then you would be able to connect the dots yourself
If someone does not realise after 3 years that someone is "fake". Well I wouldn't rely on that person's judgement
If someone does not realise after 3 years that someone is "fake". Well I wouldn't rely on that person's judgement
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?