Room 101

  • Please check your spam/junk folder after registration, for your email. Thank you
Welcome to our Swinging Community
Join now to meet other like-minded swingers.
Sign up
Lips_Pearls

Lips_Pearls

19 March 2015
23,755
64,858
OK, you've all seen the programme, so this should be straightforward.* Nominate one thing to put into Room 101, tell us all why you want it gone and I will, as the guardian of the room, decide whether or not it goes in.
Obviously, the more convincing - or funnier - your argument is, the more likely it is to go in to Room 101.
I am going to be strict about this :Ohyessir:



*What am I saying?? These threads are never straightforward :palm:
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: MaleMan and Gemnjon69
GeoffRy

GeoffRy

1 September 2018
1,621
6,213
City
Cardiff
The undertaking rule/law on the motorways.
How many times have you Sat in the far right lane,( that is supposed to be used to overtake cars that are overtaking), driving along at 70 because some twat is Sat in the middle lane or overtaking lane also doing 70 and a third twat is Sat in the right lane doing 70. Whilst the left lane or driving lane is completely empty. Now I personally never break the speed limit but if i wanted I could drive in the driving lane at 70 plus a (teeny bit) and underovertake them but it's illegal so I can't.
Remember the quicker our journeys the longer our meets. And less pollution or some such carbon thingies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deleted member 6485 and Pearls
D

Deleted member 1030

GeoffRy said:
The undertaking rule/law on the motorways.
How many times have you Sat in the far right lane,( that is supposed to be used to overtake cars that are overtaking), driving along at 70 because some twat is Sat in the middle lane or overtaking lane also doing 70 and a third twat is Sat in the right lane doing 70. Whilst the left lane or driving lane is completely empty. Now I personally never break the speed limit but if i wanted I could drive in the driving lane at 70 plus a (teeny bit) and underovertake them but it's illegal so I can't.
Remember the quicker our journeys the longer our meets. And less pollution or some such carbon thingies.
Click to expand...
Hmmm, I'm not sure that getting frustrated with the dweeb hogging the middle lane is eco-friendly :rofl: (and, let's face it, they are always dweebs *adopts John Major accent* "I am going at the speed limit, no-one has any cause to complain" :rolleyes:). But, yes, they can be dangerous and incredibly feckin annoying, leading to road-rage and undertaking.
However, it these dweebs that are at fault and not the undetaking rules.
:hmm:Hmmm, I'm tempted to put it in....... but, as I say, it's not the rules that are at fault and that's what you want to put in, not the offending roadhogs........ :confused:
Celtic_Warrior said:
Think lane hoggers not the undertaking law cause it makes sense being able to over take either side of someone makes it impossible for the person being overtaken to know what your doing
Click to expand...
Exactly

Ah, feck it - seeing as you're the first (sensible :rolleyes:) reply, it's going in to Room 101 :D
room101in.gif
 
GeoffRy

GeoffRy

1 September 2018
1,621
6,213
City
Cardiff
Celtic_Warrior said:
Think lane hoggers not the undertaking law cause it makes sense being able to over take either side of someone makes it impossible for the person being overtaken to know what your doing
Click to expand...
It works in the U.S.A up to five lanes and you can drive in any of them. But yeah ban lane hoggers but then they say I had to stay in the middle lane in case no one would let me out to overtake. The invisible slow moving traffic that is never in the left lane. Aaaaaargh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Therapon
Celtic_Warrior

Celtic_Warrior

19 May 2015
137
429
City
Swansea
Yh works in the states with 5 lane highways two with Muppets in this country barely able to follow simple instructions and there are a lot more accidents due to overtaking in the US aswell per capita
 
D

Deleted member 1030

OK, that's one entry into the room. Who's next? Any swinging ones to put in?
 
Baldrick

Baldrick

5 July 2016
5,740
9,823
City
Ossett
meandlis said:
OK, that's one entry into the room. Who's next? Any swinging ones to put in?
Click to expand...

The Conservative Party.
Technically they are Swingers as they spend each and every day fucking everyone, which incidentally is the reason they need to go into Room 101 :D

Open and shut case surely yer honour?

X
 
D

Deleted member 1030

Baldrick said:
The Conservative Party.
Technically they are Swingers as they spend each and every day fucking everyone, which incidentally is the reason they need to go into Room 101 :D

Open and shut case surely yer honour?

X
Click to expand...
Well, it can be an awfully slippery slope if we start putting whole political parties into Room 101 - but if there is any one of them that deserve it, it's this current bunch of incompetent, unfeeling, ignorant mix of toffs and robots. Of course I'm going to put the Conservatives into Room 101 :D
room101in.gif
Baldrick said:
Can I put @MP386 in Room 101 for the overuse of the Drama Queen & Cringe buttons? :D

X
Click to expand...
No, you've had one go already :p
room101denied.gif
 
fincon

fincon

10 July 2018
1,289
3,775
meandlis said:
Well, it can be an awfully slippery slope if we start putting whole political parties into Room 101
Click to expand...
Well, it’s your room, so your rules, but yeah, I for one would be at the least mildly concerned about putting them in without limiting it to, say, particular faction(s), putting in everyone who’s a member, or who voted for them, or even had voted for them at one time or another over the past, I dunno, 35 years.

As wary as I’d be as someone saying ‘the Labour Party’ merely because of the current lot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pearls
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom