My first encounter with swinging and adult related sites goes back to the hey day of Yahoo and MSN groups, back then photo verfication was not an issue, no one gave it a thought. Back then most people who joined the adult sites where genuinely looking for like minded couples/individuals, yes there was a few jokers, timewasters and trolls but they never lasted long. Becoming trusted amoung the community was more down to interacting with fellow site members via the forums and chatrooms (usually IRC) if you developed a rapport with someone you'd move to PM's and exchange pics and often thats as far as things went (well for me anyway). Then there was the socials once you'd established you where serious and you would then often get on the guest list if you asked to attend. Failure to turn up without prior warning was a big black mark against you, but attending and meeting others face to face in a social environment was a big boost to your credibility.
Okay I drifted a little off topic, I've never seen the need to photo verify myself, I was always happy to put the leg work in to prove I was genuine and until fairly recently thought who would want to pretend to be a single guy. But stories of lesbians pretending to be guys to lure young females has made me think a little differently. I am these days quite pro PV but as to making it compulsory I'm uncertain. Does it actually prove that sexy young female, hot couple or guy is what they claim to be? I'd say yes it does in as much as they appear to be what they claim to be regarding gender and status but being an arsehole doesn't show on a photo.
Fakes! how long before the photoshop brigade become proficiant enough to take a picture they've found elsewhere of someone holding a sheet of paper and superimpose thier own "hand written" user name etc? A few including Admin know I moderate on another swingers site and no it don't begin with an "F" where I do the photo verifications and some of the attempts are quite good others laughable but still they try.
When I read the thread the other day someone mentioned about restricting access of certain parts the site to PV members only. I think its a reasonable idea, more carrot than stick. I think if PV is that important to the site then members should be encouraged rather than forced ie. if you don't want to be PV'd you don't have to be but you've got to put up with the restrictions placed upon you, rather than if you don't PV by whatever time limit you're deleted.