Yes this is one of the reasons why we are always cautious and usually how we sniff out fakes. (not giving anything else away) Face pics in the gallery, but won't PV?Yes it should IMHO.
I actually find it quite confusing if people have photos up in public galleries of their faces but then won't photo verify. I don't follow non photo verified accounts, partly for my own privacy, partly cos i don't know if they are who they say they are x
Yes this is one of the reasons why we are always cautious and usually how we sniff out fakes. (not giving anything else away) Face pics in the gallery, but won't PV?
Doesn't make sense. x
Well exactly, that's the whole point. If people are comfy adding face pics to the gallery and resistant to doing a PV, then that's always a bad sign.Yeah... it does.
I can put any pictures in my gallery but I can't photo verify one of those pictures............ if they're not me. Not unless I'm very talented with photoshop anyway...
Well exactly, that's the whole point. If people are comfy adding face pics to the gallery and resistant to doing a PV, then that's always a bad sign.
Was I not supposed to say that? Delete as required lol
Unfortunately it would have to be based on several factors; have I met them myself? Do I know them or know of them etc?@Admin I know there are a few members who are not PV but have been to socials and have verifications from multiple verified members, would you consider them for verified memberships and possibly change their status reflect this or would you still require the photo? Just a question like......
Unfortunately it would have to be based on several factors; have I met them myself? Do I know them or know of them etc?
Do I know any of the people who have met them?
So really it's not a hard and fast rule, especially for established members who may have been to socials and not PV. Especially if I/we know them or of them.
Sometimes after socials where we've been, you'll regularly see me posting - have PV'd your account as we met.
Know what I mean? So it's not set in stone, but it would be dependant on who, what where etc?
Which I think is fair.
Yeah get ya mate. Just wondered really.Unfortunately it would have to be based on several factors; have I met them myself? Do I know them or know of them etc?
Do I know any of the people who have met them?
So really it's not a hard and fast rule, especially for established members who may have been to socials and not PV. Especially if I/we know them or of them.
Sometimes after socials where we've been, you'll regularly see me posting - have PV'd your account as we met.
Know what I mean? So it's not set in stone, but it would be dependant on who, what where etc?
Which I think is fair.
I think it is a very valid question.Yeah get ya mate. Just wondered really.
Im not meeting you again.Oh and just a side note on this subject, I once met a "lady" from an unverified site who had sent me some attractive pictures !
Unfortunately they were 20 years and 10 stone out of date !!!
Neither of which would have been an issue had she been honest !!!!
Ok so, i suppose most are wondering as am I?
Those members who fail to 'if it goes ahead' site wide,
provide facial verification.. what happens to them?
They will be banned or removed from the site.... IF it goes ahead.Ok so, i suppose most are wondering as am I?
Those members who fail to 'if it goes ahead' site wide,
provide facial verification.. what happens to them?
Ok thanks hun.. the answer i expected.. xThey will be banned or removed from the site.... IF it goes ahead.
Quite simply removed. Really risky move, but if that's what everyone wants then that's what the outcome will be for those who do not decide to do it.
You're welcome. xOk thanks hun.. the answer i expected.. x
I don't think it's risky to have a smaller site but a site that is 99.9% genuine. Short term the site will lose but long term it will gain. A lot I think.They will be banned or removed from the site.... IF it goes ahead.
Quite simply removed. Really risky move, but if that's what everyone wants then that's what the outcome will be for those who do not decide to do it.
Exactly. As we've said for quite some time now, I'd rather have 3k genuine members, than 300k with an unknown colossal amount of fakes, wasters and dreamers.I don't think it's risky to have a smaller site but a site that is 99.9% genuine. Shirt term the site will lose but long term it will gain. A lot I think.
Exactly. As we've said for quite some time now, I'd rather have 3k genuine members, than 300k with an unknown colossal amount of fakes, wasters and dreamers.
Yes I agree totally.In the end when a site gets like that the genuine people begin to think 'what's the point?' And leave. Which leaves less genuine people so you end up with a site primarily made up of the people you didn't want on there in the first place... I think.
Yes I think so... I don't think any other site does it.To be perfectly honest.. as far as im concerned its the way forward.
As far as I'm aware it will be the only swinging site.. to inisist all members are photo verified.. thus ensuring ALL members are genuine.. x
BOOM!!Yes I agree totally.
Yes I think so... I don't think any other site does it.
Sorry for the delay, was only verifying @BoltonBiFemCpl !!I was you know!
Not bad going!Well it took me a while but I remembered for at least 3 hours
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?