Royals

  • Please check your spam/junk folder after registration, for your email. Thank you
Welcome to our Swinging Community
Join now to meet other like-minded swingers.
Sign up
7 April 2018
212
645
City
Coddington
Not sure how to answer it.. whilst it doesnt impact me one way or another if they are here I do think though they are an important part of or countrys history and do bring in a lot of tourism
 
  • Like
Reactions: The-Gent
24 November 2015
20,110
56,051
I am although I find I don't really no longer pay much attention to what the likes of charles and camilla get up to, the young royals are certainly heading people in the right direction of people popularity once again
 
11 April 2018
31
69
42
City
Blaydon
I'm not a fan of the royals but know that they bring a lot of revenue into the country by means of extra tourists etc.
 
16 October 2015
430
1,488
City
Nuneaton
Definite royalist but feel Charles should make way for William to reign. 100% sure this won’t happen though and will be to the detriment of the country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Miss-Sexy-Legs
22 July 2017
630
3,998
City
Nottingham
People look to icons... The Royal Family set a tone/history/president..... They are England's better version of the Kardashian's.... I think in today's society they pull in people and are a ''spectacle'' to be seen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pearls
Lovernotfighter

MOTM

3 February 2016
6,692
16,822
City
York
I'm not really much of a royalist but I don't have anything against them, what does sting for though is the expense all the palaces surely the monarch needs nothing more than a London residence and a country one, the same with the Prince of Wales and his household.

Please note I refer to the constitutional positions rather than individuals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pearls
7 April 2018
212
645
City
Coddington
I'm not really much of a royalist but I don't have anything against them, what does sting for though is the expense all the palaces surely the monarch needs nothing more than a London residence and a country one, the same with the Prince of Wales and his household.

Please note I refer to the constitutional positions rather than individuals.

Im pretty sure though they have to pay for their other properties, most of the money they get is for the upkeep and restoration of bucks palace.
Prince Charles place has all the products it produces there paying towards his estate I believe.
 
4 July 2017
4,745
2,654
City
Glastonbury
Are you a Royalist or not?
I kinda vacillate between totally disestablish them - make them private citizens and take away any public roles, maybe let them keep their top 10 castles or whatever - and then on the other hand I think hang them as an affront to democracy.

Swings and roundabouts, really.

:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deleted member 6485

Vanezza

Stud Muffin
11 May 2017
11,328
37,235
51
I'm not a royalist however I don't have anything against them what does irritate is all this about Kate and where she is having her baby, who gives a monkey's. Women have been having babies for centuries without having it anounced on the BBC news.

Vxxx
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pearls
4 July 2017
4,745
2,654
City
Glastonbury
I'm not a royalist however I don't have anything against them what does irritate is all this about Kate and where she is having her baby, who gives a monkey's. Women have been having babies for centuries without having it anounced on the BBC news.

Vxxx
Like this...?

royal-baby2.jpg
 
19 March 2015
23,755
64,858
:D
Go on..... see if you can guess.
Well it's not hard is it... :D I imagine something like this;

"They're leeches, who bleed from societies money pit, live in luxury and lavishness, yet so many poor, starving and hungry people in our land. Especially when there's homelessness. Taxes; don't go there.
Sell off everything they have, distribute it to the poor & needy, ditch the anarchy - make a republic"

Or something along those lines. :whistle:
 
4 July 2017
4,745
2,654
City
Glastonbury
Well it's not hard is it... :D I imagine something like this;

"They're leeches, who bleed from societies money pit, live in luxury and lavishness, yet so many poor, starving and hungry people in our land. Especially when there's homelessness. Taxes; don't go there.
Sell off everything they have, distribute it to the poor & needy, ditch the anarchy - make a republic"

Or something along those lines. :whistle:
Yes, if you want to talk about large families in over large house, full of wastrels, living at tax payer-expense in London... ladies and gents, I give you... our overlords...

*bows sooo low his hair touches the floor*

Royal-Family-Portrait-2015--127304.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pearls
D

Deleted member 1030

Well it's not hard is it... :D I imagine something like this;

"They're leeches, who bleed from societies money pit, live in luxury and lavishness, yet so many poor, starving and hungry people in our land. Especially when there's homelessness. Taxes; don't go there.
Sell off everything they have, distribute it to the poor & needy, ditch the anarchy - make a republic"

Or something along those lines. :whistle:
I was going to go with 'anachronistic bullshit that costs too much and is used to remind us oiks of our place' but yours is good, too :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pearls
22 July 2017
630
3,998
City
Nottingham
The Royals are a business and a brand...... Just like the kardashians!!!! I wonder who makes the biggest pot of gold!?!? I think it would be a close call!
 
7 April 2018
212
645
City
Coddington
Is it really that bad to have a Royal family, don't they bring in huge revenue?
I don't know figures but I guess it's a lot.

Its a lot of money that is brought in and for every wedding, new baby etc there is even more tourism and money spent!
People seem to forget aswell when they say get rid of them and sell off the properties that it would make lots & lots of people unemployed which would only add to issues.