Bi-men
- Thread starter Pearls
- Start date
- Tagged users None
-
Please check your spam/junk folder after registration, for your email. Thank you
MOTM
Because, and I quote;
"This formula is the standard swinging convention across the world and reflects the consensus of opinion among both male and female swingers of all countries."
MOTM
EnglishBecause, and I quote;
"This formula is the standard swinging convention across the world and reflects the consensus of opinion among both male and female swingers of all countries."
Because, and I quote;
"This formula is the standard swinging convention across the world and reflects the consensus of opinion among both male and female swingers of all countries."
They believe that it's consensus (widely agreed among swingers) between male and female swingers, that bi play between men is unacceptable and is a standard swinging convention (agreement and practise) across the world.English
MOTM
Yep. Amazing isn't it? In this day and age, that this is actually listed under their rules.
I work with three men, one is gay, two are bi. They have more fun than me.
I would find it a turn on to watch I guess after listening to some of the conversations
I would find it a turn on to watch I guess after listening to some of the conversations
Given that even antiquated private members' clubs in London have had to buckle down and accept, say, woman into their halls it's good to know there's still a place for mindless prejudice in the 21st century.
So is there some written Swinger's Constitution that I can symbolically burn on the steps of the Supreme Court?
It's quite odd, given they state clearly that it's a consensus among all swingers' globally, that guy bi-play is a no-no. Sheesh. It's a strict 'code of conduct' that must be adhered to. While happy to allow bi men in, they must play straight and straight only, or it's a breach of conduct.
People shouldn't have rules sooo frickin' pointless as to positively invite people such as myself to make a blatant point about their very pointlessness.
What a bunch of nob ends
But bi female play is fine then, there's a double standard. I'm guessing that once people get to know this they wont be having many events in the future as people just wont go. I find bi male play as sexy and a turn on as bi female.
Vxxx
I have read this thread and learned that I would be labelled as 'Bi-friendly', a label I strongly disagree with.
I am neither 'Bi-friendly', 'straight friendly', 'pansexual friendly' or any of them other daft labels. I am simply 'friendly' or to put a more accurate label on me 'I couldn't give a feck what sexuality you are, you are just another human being to me'.
As for us. Kaz likes fellas and ladies.
I'm a tad more complicated cos I like the ladies/female form, but I am attracted to the mind as well and some of the gents minds on SS are attractive to me (I can't think of a better way to describe it) but all the hairyness and dangly bits put me off so I'm sticking with the ladies
B x
I am neither 'Bi-friendly', 'straight friendly', 'pansexual friendly' or any of them other daft labels. I am simply 'friendly' or to put a more accurate label on me 'I couldn't give a feck what sexuality you are, you are just another human being to me'.
As for us. Kaz likes fellas and ladies.
I'm a tad more complicated cos I like the ladies/female form, but I am attracted to the mind as well and some of the gents minds on SS are attractive to me (I can't think of a better way to describe it) but all the hairyness and dangly bits put me off so I'm sticking with the ladies
B x
MOTM
Amazing isn't it how we evolve when we explore a new life style and see people (male or female) around a completely different scenario. This attraction probably wouldn't happen in the work place for example but when you are taking to gents here it can change the way you see things sexually
Bingo.I have read this thread and learned that I would be labelled as 'Bi-friendly', a label I strongly disagree with.
I am neither 'Bi-friendly', 'straight friendly', 'pansexual friendly' or any of them other daft labels. I am simply 'friendly' or to put a more accurate label on me 'I couldn't give a feck what sexuality you are, you are just another human being to me'.
As for us. Kaz likes fellas and ladies.
I'm a tad more complicated cos I like the ladies/female form, but I am attracted to the mind as well and some of the gents minds on SS are attractive to me (I can't think of a better way to describe it) but all the hairyness and dangly bits put me off so I'm sticking with the ladies
B x
All you have to be is be tolerant of other people's differences.
All you have to do is as much or as little as you like.
Nothing else matters.
This is very important;
The term 'bi-friendly' is not a label, but an expressive way to say - especially for clubs, that said persons have no issues being around people of a bisexual nature.
In that context, it's a perfectly acceptable phrase to get across to all, not individuals, that in order to attend for example;
L&P's Bi Night, you must be Bi-Friendly - meaning you have no issues with that, which is a completely different context to how one would describe themselves.
I specifically used the term bi-friendly to calm someone down earlier in the discussion, instead of saying - dude, you're just homophobic - admit it.
That way the discussion could continue without heated words being exchanged regarding his blatant homophobic approach.
Have you ever seen a gathering of bisexuals?This is very important;
The term 'bi-friendly' is not a label, but an expressive way to say - especially for clubs, that said persons have no issues being around people of a bisexual nature.
In that context, it's a perfectly acceptable phrase to get across to all, not individuals, that in order to attend for example;
L&P's Bi Night, you must be Bi-Friendly - meaning you have no issues with that, which is a completely different context to how one would describe themselves.
I specifically used the term bi-friendly to calm someone down earlier in the discussion, instead of saying - dude, you're just homophobic - admit it.
That way the discussion could continue without heated words being exchanged regarding his blatant homophobic approach.
I have, once or twice. It's not pleasant.
Amazing isn't it how we evolve when we explore a new life style and see people (male or female) around a completely different scenario. This attraction probably wouldn't happen in the work place for example but when you are taking to gents here it can change the way you see things sexually
Yes I agree. Being involved in this lifestyle opens the mind to possibilities one may not give a second thought to in everyday life. I was pretty open minded anyway but in the vanilla world it is much more difficult to have these kinds of discussions.
For example I don't think my work colleagues could grasp the concept of being attracted to somebodies mind male or female. I'd probably get called a fag or some other derogatory term because they would assume this made me Bi-sexual or homosexual.
Even tolerating others sexual differences seems like the wrong phrase to me. I tolerate the taxman stealing from me every month even though I want to metaphorically poke him in the eyes.
I don't tolerate my friends being man and wife, because what's to tolerate. It's quite acceptable and natural.
Equally I don't tolerate my friends being man and man, or wife and wife because it's not something that upsets me.
But yes I understand the point you are making, live and let live. Do whatever it is you like to do and leave others to do whatever they like to do
This is very important;
The term 'bi-friendly' is not a label, but an expressive way to say - especially for clubs, that said persons have no issues being around people of a bisexual nature.
In that context, it's a perfectly acceptable phrase to get across to all, not individuals, that in order to attend for example;
L&P's Bi Night, you must be Bi-Friendly - meaning you have no issues with that, which is a completely different context to how one would describe themselves.
I specifically used the term bi-friendly to calm someone down earlier in the discussion, instead of saying - dude, you're just homophobic - admit it.
That way the discussion could continue without heated words being exchanged regarding his blatant homophobic approach.
I wasn't basing the label on anything you in partucular you had said. I was sort of just saying would I be labelled as 'bi-friendly', maybe 'bi-tolerant', or 'bi-acceptance'. I don't know, I'm just waffling now
.As for clubs using the term 'bi-friendly' as acceptable, I think it would be more acceptable if in this day and age clubs didn't need to use the term 'bi-friendly'. Surely clubs should be expected to be 'bi-friendly' anyway without having to state it, after all they don't feel the need to express they are 'hetero-friendly'. Know what I mean?
But yes I understand what you are saying
.B x